Archive for June, 2007

The T-List

T-List, where have you been all my life. Okay, maybe for the last two years. What an excellent idea, a list of popular travel and tourism blogs. For the most part, I am interested in the travel and tourism technology side of the discussion, but all of these blogs are worthwhile and provide active and lively discussion on the topics. Here is the current list that I discovered on RadarOn.

To continue the T-List follow these instructions (as provided by RadarOn):

Instructions
- Write a post.
- Copy/paste the link list from the post you’ve discovered the T-List into it.
- Make sure the links are active and correct.
- If your blog is on the list, remove it’s not a self-promotion post. As Tim Fehlman (Z-List) said : “Don’t worry, because if your name is on mine, it’s on others and will spread.”
- Add your favorite tourism and travel blogs on it.
- Add the url of the blog where you’ve discovered the T-List as well.
- Publish the post.
- People will notice the T-List and continue it.

Sphere: Related Content

PhoCusWright Long Tail Predictions

PhoCusWright, the travel industry research authority released their five predictions about the future of the long tail in travel. The article is excellent and is a clear acknowledgment that technologies such as online booking systems and tour operator software specifically designed for sme tour operators are where the industry is going. Bob Offutt states:

“There are low cost and shareware packages that provide the capability for a small travel supplier to accept and confirm reservations online. With the low cost of hardware, it only takes a small investment to put a simple reservation system online. We are seeing a proliferation of these systems from parking reservations to dining, bed and breakfast (B&B) reservations, preshipped luggage, weather, traffic, flight information and event tickets.”

We have known for several years that the landscape of travel, especially online, was changing. It is very re-assuring to see that groups like PhoCusWright have done the work to justify our business model and prove that the traditional model of distributing travel products has to change in order to compete in the new travel marketplace.

In summary, the five predictions are:

  • The little guy’s (product, channel, site, business) influence is significant
  • The sum of the niches is embraced
  • The 80/20 rule is debunked (“law of the vital few”)
  • The size of your reputation matters more than the size of your marketing budget
  • Distressed, “out of print” or discontinued product now has value

Sphere: Related Content

The Long Tail of Travel

As a technologist with a focus on tourism and travel technologies I have had the opportunity to work with SME tour operators for some time. For most savvy operators, the opportunity to use new technologies to increase their exposure and bookings is ever present. For some, however, the perceived reality of implementing such a solution is simply too remote, too expensive, and too complex. In actuality there is an ever growing list of systems that can be used for this purpose.

There is a huge opportunity to move these disparate providers onto the Internet. The challenge is that many of them are not yet mentally ready to take the leap. For many it is outside their area of expertise and the perceived cost of making such a leap is too high for them to risk. The reality is that the costs are very small when compared to traditional marketing and sales initiatives. The difficulty is that there is a lack of knowledge amongst most tour operators. We experienced this in the last six months as we targeted sme tour operators in our region. The concept of using a new technology to distribute their product was enticing, but the unknowns were simple to numerous for them to make a commitment.

So how do we reach the long tail? My feeling is that it is going to take a combination of increasing exposure to these new technologies and a systematic focus on educating sme operators about systems and benefits of these tools. Thanks in part to new hardware, infrastructure, and greater capacity, we don’t have to worry about educating users on the benefits of the Internet and we can focus strictly on the benefits of specific applications and tools. It will undoubtedly take a longer time to convert the long tail then we first anticipated, but at the very least, the leading edge of the tail will steadily grow as more and more of the sme operators become more sophisticated.

Sphere: Related Content

Adapting to Change is Crucial for Small Businesses

Change is inevitable. Failure is inevitable. Failure to change is not inevitable. A recent experience with our sales approach and marketing plan has lead to a shift in focus for the company. We found that after a couple of months of fully executing our sales plan that we were seeing a very low rate of conversion of trial accounts to paid accounts. After investigating further we discovered that the majority of the leads we were targeting were not particularly Internet savvy or technologically inclined. As disappointed as we were with this realization, we decided that we could not abandon our focus on the long tail of travel. Our underlying belief is that small and medium tourism & travel companies will be distributing their products online in some way. Reality is, however, that the time for many of these companies is not yet here. Our target now is the leading edge of the tail, in other words, those companies that are technically savvy and have the foresight to appreciate Rezgo and the opportunities that it presents. We are excited about this new focus because it means supporting a more sophisticated group of users. Eventually, the less sophisticated companies will follow and when they are ready, we will be there for them.

Sphere: Related Content

Overcoming the Three Big Tour Operator Challenges

For a long time now, prospective travelers have had the ability to search, find and make their basic flight and hotel reservations on-line. Only recently has it been possible for these same travelers to book their destination products, such as sightseeing tours and attraction tickets on line as well. Despite this trend, however, there is still no primary distribution system; which means that most travelers have to visit many different individual websites in order to purchase their destination products.

For a tour operator, one of the most important goals is to sell seats. The challenge is how to sell more seats and what systems to use to manage those sales. There are several challenges facing individual tour operators providers when choosing to sell their products through their website or through a booking portal. The first challenge is deciding what kind of solution to use. There are primarily two types of on line booking systems available. One is stand-alone, which means that it is installed directly on a website, the other is hosted, which means it is installed and managed by another company. Generally speaking, stand-a-lone booking engines require an upfront license fee and require the tour operator to have access to a hosting facility, IT expertise, and the ability to install and manage the software. The key benefit to a stand-alone solution is that the tour operator has complete control of their system and can customize it to fit their specific needs. The biggest disadvantage of a stand-a-lone system is that the tour operator’s products are only available from their website and cannot be distributed openly. Stand-alone systems can also be very costly, requiring both software and specialized hardware. Hosted solutions are sometimes referred to as “software as a service” solutions and are rented on a monthly basis. Because hosted solutions are shared by many users, they are generally lower cost, although not always, and do not support customizations. Although some solutions support distribution of products through a branded portal website, very few actually allow for the open distribution of destination products through some kind of global distribution system.

The second major challenge for tour operators is deciding whether to use a system that charges a flat fee or a commission. This can be a tougher challenge to overcome because both hosted and stand-alone systems charge both flat fees and commissions. So once the tour operator has chosen a technology, they must decide if the cost of the system is appropriate. The benefit of a commission based system is that there is generally very little cost to the tour operator until a sale is made and then the tour operator pays on average about a five percent commission on the sale of their products through the system. In some cases, the commission can be as low as one percent or as high as twenty-five percent. This may seem attractive because there are no upfront or ongoing costs, but the costs of a commission based system can quickly add up. Flat fee systems are more difficult to find because, for some reason, they are not the norm for the travel industry. Flat fee systems charge a regular monthly fee and a flat booking fee, generally between twenty-five cents and one dollar per booking. When compared with a commission based system, one might see why the the flat fee system is so attractive. A tour operator selling ten bookings a week with a retail value of a $350 per booking using a commission system which charges 10% would cost the tour operator $1,400 per month, compared to a flat fee system charging forty dollars per month and seventy-five cents per booking.

The third and perhaps most important challenge is how to distribute products through multiple on line and off line sales channels while managing inventory. This challenge is surprisingly not that difficult to overcome, primarily because there are so few choices for tour distribution systems. The major GDSs do not currently support destination products and are focused almost exclusively on the distribution of major airlines, hotels, and cruises. There are other consumer based tour product websites that will sell products on behalf of tour operators, however in almost all cases, these tour booking websites are simply travel agencies that charge a hefty commission or require exclusive net pricing. The best option for the tour operator is to find a system that allows them to manage their inventory, streamlines their sales process, gives them the ability to sell through their own website, and provides an underlying distribution network that allows them to resell their products through both on line and off line sales channels.

In summary, there is an immense number of tour operators who have not yet taken the leap to software based solutions for inventory, sales, and customer management. Although the number of solutions that provide some or all of these requirements is growing, they all present their own strengths and weaknesses. The best and most flexible solution would present itself as a hosted solution with an integrated distribution system. The solution would allow tour operators to manage their inventory, bookings, customer information, and provide lots of reporting. Ideally it would be a flat fee system that charges a monthly fee based on the operator’s volume of bookings rather than charging a commission. The system would, however, still allow the operator to set commissions on products that are sold through third party resellers, so that they can compensate their sales peoples appropriately. It would have an integrated consumer booking engine that would give the tour operator options for customizing the look of their website. Lastly, the system would also have an open application interface that would allow more technologically savvy operators to totally customize their consumer booking experience and integrate products in unique and interesting ways.

Sphere: Related Content

Comparing Web Booking Engines

It seems that the Internet is full of applications that allow tour operators, independent hotel and motel owners and packaged vacation providers with online booking capabilities. Many of these booking engines are extremely expensive and many are not. Some are hosted and some are stand-a-lone. So how do you choose one that is right for your organization? Here are some important things to keep in mind as you begin your research and compare the products.

1. Compare apples to apples
Many booking engines are actually booking portals. This is especially true if you are an Adventure Travel company or an Accommodations provider. Booking portals are generally run by companies that are travel agencies or travel wholesalers who sell your products for you and charge a commission. The traveller who purchases from the booking portal is more likely to go back to the booking portal rather than going back to you. If you choose to stop using the booking portal, your products stop showing up on the booking portal website. Although booking portals can provide you with additional marketing for your products, you don’t have direct control over how the portal markets itself. You need to decide if the portal’s brand is more important than your own.

2. Know your costs
When it comes to paying for a booking engine there are generally two types of payments. Most booking engines are commission based, which means they charge you a “small commission” of between 1% to 5% to process the booking of your products. Some of these engines, especially the larger more well established ones can charge a one time integration fee of $10,000 to $60,000. Some, but very few, are flat monthly fee based engines that charge you a flat monthly and transaction fee per booking regardless of your sales revenue. Be careful, a “small commission” is often more than double the cost of the flat fee engines even with the highest price premium subscription. If you own a small hotel and generate about $1M in online bookings in a year and you pay 5% commissions to your booking engine, you will pay close to $90,000 per year. By comparison, if you use rezgo.com, a flat fee booking engine, you will pay about $7,000, a savings of $83,000. Why the big difference? None really, that I’ve been able to find.

3. Eliminate the middleman
Everyone knows that the travel industry is full of middlemen. Every time a product gets touched by someone, it creeps up in price incrementally. The more middlemen, the higher the price. That’s why airlines, major hotels, and large tour operators now sell directly to travellers. In order to be cost competitive many of these providers are looking for ways to reduce their transaction costs. Cutting out the large commission based GDS companies is one way of doing this. Look at adding a booking engine to your own website and drive traffic to your site instead of driving it to a third party booking portal. You’re much better off owning the relationship with your customer.

4. Don’t forget about Agents
In your efforts to sell directly to your end customer, don’t forget the selling power of Travel Agents. Travel agencies are looking for alternative providers to satisfy the needs of their clients. Travel agents are sales people looking for the best commission they can find on a unique and interesting product for a customer. Make sure you can control your relationship with the agents and by cutting out the middle man, you can pay the agent a higher commission. You get your products in front of the buying public and the travel agent gets a reasonable commission for their sale, its a win win for everyone.

In conclusion, remember that committing to a booking engine provider can be a long term relationship with significant cost implications. Many booking engines or portals require a long term contract, so consider where you plan to be in the future and see if the decision you make today is going to be the right one in a year or two. Finally, any booking engine is only as effective as you make it, so if you plan on using a booking engine, you will need to make a commitment to use it and use it well.

Sphere: Related Content

Travel/Tourism & Web 2.0

I finally found a site that mentions both travel and web 2.0 in the same article:

“In the world of travel, disparate data from direct sources, travel agents and intermediaries made it nearly impossible to find the best price or options for an itinerary. Sites like Expedia, Travelocity and Orbitz transformed that forever (and sites like Kayak are creating even more efficiency).”

Found on http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0/zeitgeist

Although I understand the context of the statement, the writer, Rand Fishkin, misses one important point when it is applied to these sites. In all cases, the sites mentioned are travel agents who all use the same underlying technologies: Sabre, Worldspan, Amadeus, and Gallileo. That’s right, there is no difference between Expedia and the travel agent down the street except that if you buy from the travel agent, you can always complain to them if something goes wrong. What is missing from the statement is that in no case has there been any attempt by companies to change or disrupt the distribution model of travel products. Why is this the case? Because the major airlines and hotel chains own the GDS companies and changing the model now would be an incredibly expensive endeavour. What I don’t understand is why a distribution model based on archaic technologies like mainframes, dumb terminals, green screens, screen scrapers, and even DOS would even be considered revolutionary. Show me a company that is trying to change the way travel products are managed and distributed and I’ll show you a company that truly deserves to be referred to as Web 2.0.

Oh wait… I know one. ;-)

Sphere: Related Content